Not even the scholars seem to be starting yet in agreement in classify basic emotions, even though every day it seems that consensus is more to divide emotions into two large families: the pleasurable and the displacenteras. However, with the rise of the study of the emotions, a view on the relationship between reason and emotion is varying, and is realizing that much of our decisions, have been governed by the recondite and disturbing helmsman of our feelings more unfathomable. We are always deciding and, somehow, choosing as it will be our future, the bad news is that very often we are not aware of this, and to ascribe responsibility to external factors and fault – finding us in the place where we are (on everything when that place us isn’t too comfortable). However, little that we remit us of our decisions, realize that things do not pass us, but our constant elections are seeds of future developments, and so as a personal story is building. This is not inferred that one is responsible for everything that happens to your around, but if responsible for how is emotionally speaking – before what happens you, so that key really, is what one does with their emotions, not what emotions do with one, in which case would be those who would decidealmost always, indeed, tyrannically. While we are always deciding, most of these decisions are operational, i.e. habits formed precisely to reduce the necessity of thinking each time that we are facing identical situations. However, another large group of decisions not part of our daily routine, are strategic decisions, and imply a degree of emotional involvement that can be made, if we are not able to manage them properly, make us feel overwhelmed with disastrous results, since the anger, pain, envy or embarrassment, can be that decide for us, often without us being aware.